Betting on science
Odd and ends
Some bookmakers will take bets on anything—even the nature of reality
Jul 29th 2010
Tuesday February 7th 2012
Advertisement
Most commented
- Tibetans and the Chinese state: No power to pacify
- Will the euro survive 2012 intact?
- Competition: Our forthcoming China blog
- Lexington: The classes drift apart
- The politics of fairness: Fairly confusing
- Pollution in China: Man-made and visible from space
- Facebook: A fistful of dollars
- Hong Kong and the mainland: Dogs and locusts
- America in Afghanistan: Outta here
- Chinese college students: Making ting tong cool
Over the past five days
Most recommended
- Pollution in China: Man-made and visible from space
- China: The paradox of prosperity
- Alcohol: Possibly the best travel tip ever
- Facebook: A fistful of dollars
- Daily chart: Facebook by numbers
- Riding India's railways: All aboard the Vivek Express
- Fernando Henrique Cardoso on Brazil's future: More personal security, less inequality
- Immigration: What it's like to be deported
- JAS's cartoon: The week ahead
- This week in print: Mexico's politics, drug war and tequila; business in Brazil; a Canadian pipeline; and Guatemala's new president
Over the past seven days
Advertisement
Products & events
Stay informed today and every day
Subscribe to The Economist's free e-mail newsletters and alerts.
Subscribe to The Economist's latest article postings on Twitter
See a selection of The Economist's articles, events, topical videos and debates on Facebook.
Classified ads
Readers' comments
Reader comments are listed below. Comments are currently closed and new comments are no longer being accepted.
Sort:
How would you have collected your winnings if indeed the world had ended when the LHC switched on?
Jer_X:
That is presumably why you were allowed to set your own odds. At an average bet of apparently 10 pounds per person, you could just set ridiculous odds for fun.
I have a bridge in brooklyn for sale. Any takers?
Not being a gambling man, I don't understand.... odds of 100/1 on for Higgs seems to be interpreted as highly likely, but in the same paragraph "the proof of God's existence at 100/1" seems to imply highly unlikely. Can the gamblers help me here? Thanks.
What are the odds of getting an intelligent comment about this article?
Do I get to set my own?
Can you bet either side? Put me down for 1 million on the large hadron collider not finding proof of God's existance.