Jan 18th 2012, 21:08 by B.K. | LONDON
THERE'S something profoundly enchanting about the English landscape. Ancient rolling hills receding to infinity. Gnarly trees like sagacious, wizened old men, weathering time as they silently witness history. Seductive, ariot and vivacious, full of light and life. David Hockney captures some of this in his new show at the Royal Academy. Some of it he misses.
Presenting over 150 works inspired by the Yorkshire countryside, "A Bigger Picture" is just that. Like his nemesis Damien Hirst, David Hockney enjoys scale. He likes to paint a very large landscape. So much so one feels it would be churlish not to revel in the grandiosity of it. "The Arrival of Spring in Woldgate, East Yorkshire in Twenty-Eleven" (pictured top) measures a staggering 365.8 x 975.4 cm, is made up of 32 canvases and is surrounded by more than 50 large-scale preparatory sketches composed on Mr Hockney's iPad and printed onto paper. This one painting fills the largest and grandest of all of the Royal Academy's many beautiful rooms. Once one's spoken of its magnitude, though, there isn't a great deal else to say, beyond the observation that this is a very nice painting full of lovely colours. Somehow, despite it all, that doesn't feel like quite enough.
Most of the works on display were created in the last eight years. Fortunately, the show introduces us to its theme by way of Mr Hockney's very earliest landscapes. Now 74, the adored grandfather of British painting is as firmly established in the canon of art history as the unwavering purple-tree stump of "Winter Timber" (2009) is into the earth (pictured below). Back in the day, though, he was quite the wild thing. His early work has that elusive power, the raw edge of passion and urgency that circumnavigates the stultifying effects of the ego and the over-thinking mind and spills forth straight from the heart, opening itself to greatness.
One of the first paintings we come across is "Ordinary Picture" (1964). As it happens, this is the least ordinary painting in the exhibition. Rather it is exquisite, ethereal in its handling of colour and form. This is Mr Hockney's palette at its most delicate, before the subtle tonalities of nature were bulldozed by the harshness of will. Rather than challenging nature, as his more recent work is wont to do, "Ordinary Picture" submits to it with humility. Perhaps then the title is a telling projection, an eloquent tribute to the pleasures of the everyday rather than a desire to transcend.
From here the show begins to lumber forward, a marathon runner not quite prepared for the full distance. For this is a large show, very large indeed for a body of work spanning little more than eight years (though it includes a number of earlier landscapes dating from the 1950s). One wonders if the resources were quite sufficient for the task. But, “I'm rather confident,” says Mr Hockney in advance of the show's opening, “rather confident it'll be fresh as well, a lot of new things in it and a lot of new ideas about pictures, including television, including cameras.”
Mr Hockney is keen to embrace technology, dedicating a whole room to nine and 18 screen videos of nature and, somewhat randomly, dancers in his studio. But this falls flat, an uninteresting documentary rejoicing in its own technical complexity at the expense of intellectual or poetic content. Similarly, the iPad sketches cry to the world that age is no obstacle to cutting-edge dynamism. The result is quite the opposite. The media is not engaged on its own terms, so its output is as jejune as the app that made it. In Mr Hockney's skilled hands a pencil or a box of watercolours would have done a far better job. But perhaps there wasn't the time for that.
The work is segregated thematically: Tunnels, Hawthorn Blossoms, Trees and Totems, The Arrival of Spring and so on. Nature is clearly the theme here. But I can't help wondering whether the real theme is Mr Hockney's ego, with nature trailing in a poor second.
This exhibition could have been outstanding if it had been in a space a quarter of the size, with an eighth of the content, produced over double the time. As it is I'm reminded of an insightful observation spoken by the artist himself: “We grow small trying to be great.”
Read more: David Hockney, national treasure
Named after the hero of Shakespeare's "The Tempest", an expert on the power of books and the arts, this blog features literary insight and cultural commentary from our correspondents, and includes our coverage of the art market.
Advertisement
Over the past five days
Over the past seven days
Advertisement
Readers' comments
The Economist welcomes your views. Please stay on topic and be respectful of other readers. Review our comments policy.
Sort:
The last sentence sums it up nicely, this generation of artists could use some humility.
Wonderful, Mr Hockney ..... I saw an exhibition of Hockney's paintings in Schwäbisch Hall, Germany two years ago. It was fantastic !!!!
I recently saw a documentary about David Hockney about painting his Yorkshire landscapes. He seemed like a benign fellow who doesnt seem to take himself too seriously. I'm assuming the whole art world 'thing' bemuses him at his age. I guess, one should take a similiar benign laidback approach to his present work. Nicholas.
Hockney is a rip-off- His latest (copious copies without attribution) show-offs of marginal canvases are no more than PALE, pathetic, imitations of Van Gogh's brilliance and originality.
Hockney decidedly displays his ignorance of Color Theory mastered by Van Gogh and others.
Hockney is a joke and his work will not be remembered long except by those stupid enough to have purchased one.
arrtist
They're not rip-offs of Van Gogh, they're inspired by Van Gogh - an homage if you will. Good art doesn't need to be original. Colour theory's subjective. Hockney may be a joke to you but to many others his work speaks beautifully and eloquently of life and human perception.
Actually colour theory is NOT subjective....it can be demonstrated that colour are RELATIVE to EACH other...Read ITTENS book on colour. If you put a primary colour say red and its complementary say green next to each other and they fight, but mix a little green into the red and it has a greying effect.....the same with yellow..if you want to make a dark yellow add a little purple....
Look at Matisse the value of each hue is what creates form....very clever and thoughtfully produced.
But colour does not exist but for our perception of it and this depends on LIGHT and what colours are next to it....anyway enough words look at this demonstration I found:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=02LnULLXds4
So nice. The artist, the writer of the article, and the first comment. Thanks to all.
Sorry. I meant to say: So nice - the artist, the article, and the first comment. Thanks to all.
Been a long day. Nice to read this informative and delightful material. :)
Hockney has grown so much over his career. My feeling is he added depth to his thinking and that is reflected in his ideas about representing 2D space. He speaks eloquently about them and the movie & book about his investigation of lenses and projectors in the history of painting is really about how one puts 3D into 2D, not about revealing trickery or technique. I love the way his photo collages bring the space up to the picture plane and how his landscapes build space - somewhat Pissaro-like. So many artists regress and repeat. He has become more.