Newsbook

News analysis

Hosni Mubarak

The trial continues

Aug 15th 2011, 16:29 by S.N. | CAIRO

TWO weeks ago, Egyptians sat glued to their televisions as Hosni Mubarak, the man who ruled their country for 30 years, was wheeled into a Cairo courtroom, charged with corruption and the murder of unarmed demonstrators. At some point in the future, if he is found guilty, they may be able to watch him be sentenced. But what happens in between, in particular the presentation of evidence, will happen off-camera. After a mostly procedural session on Monday, presiding judge Ahmed Rifaat declared that "in the public interest", television cameras will be barred from future sittings of the court.

Mr Rifaat had been visibly annoyed with the chaos in his courtroom, in particular with the dozens of lawyers representing the families of "martyrs" allegedly shot by the police, clamouring for financial compensation for their clients. Meanwhile, in front of a large screen erected outside the court complex, pro- and anti-Mubarak crowds have hurled stones at each other. For some Egyptians, Mr Rifaat's decision restores some dignity to the trial, and discourages lawyers from raising frivolous motions to get their faces on television. (At the first session, one attorney demanded a DNA test to prove that the man in the cage was indeed Mr Mubarak, and not an imposter). Others, however, suspect that the cameras were ejected because Egypt's current military rulers, whom Mr Mubarak's lawyers have threatened to call to the stand, have something to hide.

Egyptian courtroom proceedings are not designed to be accessible to outside observers, and the country has no tradition of televising trials. Many seemed to expect that Mr Mubarak and his co-defendants would be accused, tried and convicted in a few hours of legal drama. The Mubarak trial, however, involves multiple charges and ten co-defendants and is likely to be long and ponderous. Mr Rifaat may simply have been trying to spare his every move the scrutiny of millions of impatient home viewers. However, his ruling deprives those Egyptians who are unfamiliar with the intricacies of due process of law of an unparalleled opportunity to learn about them. 

 

Readers' comments

The Economist welcomes your views. Please stay on topic and be respectful of other readers. Review our comments policy.

Jerrayssi

The US helped bring Hosni Mubarak down. It was not there to help an old and trustworthy ally. In the Oval Office continues to sit a
clueless president unable to understand why the temperature in the Middle East continues to rise... and it is not Global Warming... God help us all.

happyfish18

The Hegemon has abandon its sick camel to be eaten up by the wolves in the desert. Bad things will alway come to cronies who are no more than compradors who are only interested to fatten their pockets.

egyptophile

When you say allegedly you are quite right. This must be emphasized. The legal system in Egypt has been dysfunctional for years- like many of its institutions.

None of this is Mubarak's fault necessarily. The whole system is broken and needs repair. Yet ironically Egypt has managed to cope and even prosper for decades. This dysfunction is endemic. Paradoxically, one might say, the country cannot function otherwise.

The greatest mistake was to assume that the demonstrations in tahrir square will amount to something.
The only outcome; unless the army with the help of the U.S.A. , Israel and Western powers can prevent that- through a secular constitution for example- is the an Islamic Sunni theocracy, financed almost entirely by the Wahabi rulers in Saudi Arabia. This in one fell swoop will concolidated their power over theor country and the region and very importantly give them a counter balance to their nemesis - the Shia Theocracy of Iran. Incidentally every socalled uprising in the region is now being financed by the Sudis (look how they accuse assad of killing Sunnis,not Syrians).
Mubarak's trial is a side show.

About Newsbook

In this blog, our correspondents respond to breaking news stories and provide comment and analysis. The blog takes its name from newsbooks, the 16th- and 17th-century precursors to newspapers, which covered battles, disasters, debates and sensational trials

Advertisement

Trending topics

Read comments on the site's most popular topics

Advertisement

Products & events