Newsbook

News analysis

A row between Iraq and Kuwait

Bad blood between two allies

May 26th 2010, 16:47 by The Economist online

AN OLD row between Iraq and Kuwait has flared up again, and has manifested itself in an unusual form: Iraqi Airways has stopped flights from Baghdad to London and Sweden. Last month Kuwait tried to have the first Iraqi plane to fly to London for 20 years impounded. Kuwait Airways says the Iraqi airline owes $1.2 billion for planes and parts taken during Saddam Hussein's invasion of Kuwait in 1990, a war for which Iraq is still paying the price. The Iraqi government has now declared Iraqi Airways bankrupt in an effort to avoid paying Kuwait.

This is the latest episode in a long-running argument between the two countries about war reparations. The Iraqi government thinks that reparations worth billions of dollars owed to Kuwait should be forgiven or at least reduced. Until it settles its accounts, relations between the two supposed allies will be strained.

After Saddam was booted out, the UN Security Council ruled that Iraq should pay for any economic losses and damage. The reckoning was $53 billion in reparations, with the biggest chunk, $37 billion, going to Kuwait. Nearly two decades later Iraq still owes Kuwait around $25 billion and gives its neighbour 5% of its oil revenues each year to pay off the debt.

Last year Iraq’s ambassador to the UN asked the Security Council to reduce the payments, saying that Iraq sorely needed the money at home. Though no figure was cited, an adviser to Nuri al-Maliki, Iraq’s prime minister, later suggested that Iraq could cut its payments to 2.5%, while wistfully adding that Iraq hoped for the debt to be forgiven entirely. The Iraqi oil minister has said that the current rate of repayment is unsustainable. Iraq’s budget deficit in 2009 was around $3.6 billion (though a budget surplus of about the same about is forecast for 2010). In contrast, Kuwait has hundreds of billions of dollars to spare. Most of Iraq’s income is from oil, so the fall in the oil price means its receipts are a lot smaller than they were a year or two ago.

But principles are at stake. Iraq’s government says it is not accountable for Saddam’s dictatorship. Kuwait disagrees. According to diplomatic doctrine, it argues, today’s government is responsible for whatever yesterday’s did, however nasty it may have been. If the row is to end, Kuwait may have to accept other things from Iraq. It still wants clarity on the cases of Kuwaitis missing since the war of 1990; it still wants some bodies back; and it wants to settle a long-festering dispute over borders.

At the moment Iraq still falls under Chapter Seven of the UN charter, which empowers the Security Council to maintain peace there and to impose sanctions, so any deal on reparations must be negotiated through the UN. Iraq says it has met the conditions for it to be released from sanctions, which would leave the two countries to resolve their differences between themselves. Ban Ki-moon, the UN’s secretary-general, has in the past hinted that this might be the best way.

As the reparations row drags on, some Iraqi MPs have suggested that Kuwait should be paying reparations for letting America use it as a base for its invasion of Iraq in 2003. That seems unlikely. But such demands ensure that the bad blood lingers.

Readers' comments

The Economist welcomes your views. Please stay on topic and be respectful of other readers. Review our comments policy.

jouris

If Iraq's current government was merely a descendant of Saddam's regime, then the Kuwaiti government would have a good case. But since the US (and others) took out Saddam totally, and the current government only took over some time later, holding the current government responsible for Saddam's actions seems a lot more problematic.

And, OneAegis, that's rather different from the Treaty of Versailles. At least then, the governments being punished were the ones who had been defeated. In the Iraqi case, the current government has no real relationship to the one which was defeated.

About Newsbook

In this blog, our correspondents respond to breaking news stories and provide comment and analysis. The blog takes its name from newsbooks, the 16th-century precursors to newspapers, which covered a single big story, such as a battle, a disaster or a sensational trial

Advertisement

Trending topics

Read comments on the site's most popular topics

Advertisement

Latest blog posts - All times are GMT
Link exchange
From Free exchange - 48 mins ago
Not free to fly
From Schumpeter - 3 hrs 12 mins ago
The weekly papers
From Free exchange - February 8th, 18:24
Still Mitt by a mile
From Lexington's notebook - February 8th, 17:01
Mario blinks
From Free exchange - February 8th, 17:01
More from our blogs »
Products & events
Stay informed today and every day

Subscribe to The Economist's free e-mail newsletters and alerts.


Subscribe to The Economist's latest article postings on Twitter


See a selection of The Economist's articles, events, topical videos and debates on Facebook.