Dec 16th 2011, 10:16 by E.L.
THE European Union's economic and political malaise has many casualties. In this letter published on EU Observer leading lights from all the European thinktanks highlight another looming problem: the cost to EU foreign policy. Why should anyone take an organisation seriously that cannot make decisions about its own future? Here's the letter
Dear EU leaders,
We are seriously concerned about the impact that the current eurozone debt crisis is having on the external relations of the Union.
The first casualty is the time available for foreign policy. We recognise and support your efforts to overcome the current crisis but it is important that our relations with third countries do not suffer as a consequence. Important summits have been postponed and there is less time to focus on priority issues such as supporting the transitions in North Africa.
A second problem is the resources available for foreign policy. The EU’s budget for external affairs is already small and any further cuts would seriously impact on the EU’s pretensions to play a global role.
A third potential problem is access to the EU’s market. There are many voices calling for protection against ‘unfair competition’ from third countries. We consider it important to maintain an open EU market albeit access based on reciprocity as regards our strategic partners.
A fourth factor is the damage to the EU’s image as a well-governed entity, an important basis for the EU’s attraction as a soft power. Restoring the EU’s economic health would of course help repair the damage to our image.
Fifth, the US global footprint is set to decline due to budget cuts. This means that the EU will have to take more responsibility for its own security and regional security. It is important that this case is put to EU citizens.
Furthermore, ensuring the continuation of a strong liberal world order that emerged after the Second World War remains a key European interest. It is essential that emerging powers become stakeholders in that order.
Only a strong, united and self-confident EU can help strengthen and further develop global institutions and rules that are a necessity to ensure European security and prosperity.
The external relations of the EU cannot be seen as an afterthought. An inward looking EU will be at the mercy of others. And it will not be able to shape the global order according to its values and interests. Investment in foreign policy is an investment in the long-term viability of European freedom, prosperity and security.
Fraser Cameron, EU-Asia Centre;Ulrich Speck, Global Europe Initiative; Josef Janning, European Policy Centre; Pierre Defraigne, Madaragia Foundation; Charles Grant, Centre for European Reform; Shada Islam, Friends of Europe; Gustaaf Geererts, Brussels Institute of Contemporary China Studies; Gerald Knaus, European Stability Initiative; Nicu Popescu, European Council on Foreign Relations; Michael Emerson, Centre for European Policy Studies; Ulrike Guérot, European Council on Foreign Relations; Fabrizio Tassinari, Danish Institute for International Studies; José Ignacio Torreblanca, European Council on Foreign Relations; Jonas Parello-Plesner, European Council on Foreign Relations; Rosa Balfour, European Policy Centre; Giles Merritt, Security and Defence Agenda; Geert Cami, Friends of Europe; Richard Youngs, FRIDE; Ben Judah, European Council on Foreign Relations; Paweł Świeboda, Demos Europa; Dimitar Bechev, European Council on Foreign Relations; Sven Biscop, Egmont Institute; Stefani Weiss, Bertelsmann Stiftung; Daniel Korski, European Council on Foreign Relations; Ralf Fücks, Heinrich Böll Stiftung; Sami Andoura, Notre Europe; Jan Techau, Carnegie Europe; Heather Grabbe, Open Society Foundation; Richard Gowan, European Council on Foreign Relations; Amanda Paul, European Policy Centre; Tomáš Valášek, Centre for European Reform; Constanze Stelzenmüller, German Marshall Fund; Almut Möller, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Auswärtige Politik.
Eastern approaches deals with the economic, political, security and cultural aspects of the eastern half of the European continent. It incorporates the long-running "Europe.view" weekly column. The blog is named after the wartime memoirs of the British soldier Sir Fitzroy Maclean.
Advertisement
Over the past five days
Over the past seven days
Advertisement
Readers' comments
The Economist welcomes your views. Please stay on topic and be respectful of other readers. Review our comments policy.
Sort:
As David Cameron sneaks into Kandahar, to cheer up the soldiers, (This news has flash photographs as the weather is very dusty???) Iraq soldiers will be coming home by Christmas to have their fist pudding after some days, weeks, months, years “He says, ..while the pickets are on the streets in London...”Please do not worry, your pension is safe and by 2014. (If all goes well) (From my friend.I've lived and practiced human rights law in Iraq, and I don't agree with the war as conducted either, however, your personal one-sided opinion on an otherwise complicated matter comes across as ill-informed and naive. More importantly, it detracts from the purpose of your service and adds nothing positive to your reader's experience. Why include this?) . 2 At times I say “I thank the scientists to give us, binoculars I watch SKY.COM, there was reporter (one thing I love about SKY.Com is they always have blondes.) asking a lady who was in North Korea bordering the South Korea as a refugee, living now in South, a distance of 2 kilometre of no fly, zone, but a powerful binoculars to watch what is happening in the North. The refugee said,” The ruler is dead. Good. He was very cruel and I am happy I am here in South.”. Now that needs guts for both. I can from here say I do not like the president of Riceland, I just do not. No one will, dare dispute this as no one knows me and I do not know if the president will ever know who I am. That is an excellent report if any were to ask me. Cowardice, bravery, but a report. I love these. If a man empties his purse into his head, no one can take it away from him. An investment in knowledge always pays the best interest.
Benjamin Franklin..Entrepreneur is a polymath who exhaustively catalogues the best new research and development in virtually every area - including health and medicine. Even if you don't read the entire book, and even if you are sceptical of what he concludes, simply reading the first two chapters will radically impact your views. I thank you. Firozali A.Mulla DBA
Would u please throw some light on EU crisis and its impact on Indian economy and the role that countries like India can play to resolve or at least reduce the resultant economic problems!
"A fourth factor is the damage to the EU’s image as a well-governed entity"
What planet are these guys on ? Even Merkel gets it that the EU is a laughing stock throughout the world.
The EU has a foreign policy ?
I think it does, and a very smart one at that.Look at the results:
The EU spends on defense about a third what the US does.Still the EU has pretty much no enemies while the US has adversaries on every corner.
Only half a century ago European nations were colonial powers that had invaded pretty much the whole world, and not through very noble means. Think of the Maou-Maou, Diem-Vien Phou, British atrocities in India, apartheid, the French in Algeria, Belgian genocide in Congo,the Italians in Somalia... And yet the average Developing World citizen of today thinks of the EU as a source of foreign aid and a model for democracy and good life, while the US is generally disliked as a model of overpowering and meddlesome imperialism(look Pew).Ironic, right?
It was said the Euro would not last two years. Yet even in today´s mess, its value is still over 20% PPP against the dollar.
Russia and China are military adversaries of the US.Not of the EU.
Even in the Americas, and with the exception of Mexico, which has been surreptitiously invaded by the US (still don´t know how that will end up), most nations follow their people´s hearts and prefer the EU (some even China or amazingly Iran) to the US.
Given these historic results in only five or six decades, I wouldn´t say the EU has no foreign policy. Rather it has a covert, unconventional and quite successful foreign policy.
I certainly don't mean to suggest that European countries have no foreign policies, and that they have done better than the US in many respects. Of course, doing better than Cowboy Dubya is not a severe test. But the members of the EU have often been at cross-purposes.
So my question remains.
Thanks to the supernumerary "that" between "and" and "they" in your first sentence, you say the opposite of what you obviously mean to say.
"Of course, doing better than Cowboy Dubya is not a severe test."
Yeah...although I think this goes way back to the time Dubya used diapers.
"But the members of the EU have often been at cross-purposes."
Paranoid explanation: To appear indecisive and uncoordinated is part of the plan.
More likely explanation:It´s a matter of fundamentals, and disagreements on detail between nations are irrelevant.