Eastern approaches

Ex-communist Europe

Poland and Lithuania: a rare bit of good sense

Sense and sensibility

Apr 13th 2011, 7:41 by E.L.

GOOD sense is in short supply in the tangled story of Lithuanian-Polish misunderstandings. The story is too long to summarise here, but the two countries share a common history over past centuries, but see it differently. Lithuanians tend to think they are being bullied by Poles. Poles tend to think that Lithuania is maltreating a Slavic minority (Polish in Polish eyes, more complicated according to Lithuanians). I urge readers not to jump in at this point and claim that I am mischaracterising the issue as I am being intentionally brief. The point is that something new and welcome has happened: an open letter from pro-Polish Lithuanians denouncing the hardline nationalist camp and appeaing for reconciliation. It was written in Polish, but the Oxford-educated Lithuanian MP Mantas Adomenas has done a typically elegant translation into English. It starts:

Open letter in commemoration of the first anniversary of the death of Lech Kaczyński, President of the Republic of Poland

It is with burning concern and sorrow that we observe in Lithuania the daily destruction and disdain of the seeds of the European Christian civilisation: the virtues of wisdom and tolerance, humility and the love to one’s neighbour. Several years ago, it would have been hardly credible that unsound conspiracy theories, ill-founded or even deliberately misleading and mischievous statements that are abundant today with reference to the relations between Lithuanians and Poles could become the focus of state politics and a determining factor in the bilateral relations.

We are alarmed by the growing radicalisation and polarisation of society, as well as by the manifestations of pseudo-patriotism, such as witnessed during the 11 March procession. The chauvinist version of history which considers the shared history of Lithuania and Poland as the ‘lost centuries’ distorts the vision of the past, rejects and smears the common spiritual, political, and cultural heritage of the two nations – from the Battle of Grunwald to the Constitution of the 3rd of May, from Our Lady at the Gate of Dawn to the joint struggle against the enemy of the two nations, both in 1863 and in 1989.

We embarked on the 21st century having overcome, it seemed, the quarrels of the past and having preserved the brotherhood of the two Christian freedom-loving nations. Now we must put every effort in order to safeguard this peace and unity. Our common faith obliges us to seek peace. Therefore, more than ever should we recall the words of the Apostle who said that “there is neither Jew nor Greek” in the eyes of the Church and faith. Lithuanian citizens of the Polish origin who consider themselves Poles constitute an integral part of the Lithuanian society and the state.

We lived, we live, and we will continue to live together with them. Radicalism will not help us find a common ground or jointly build our common state. On the contrary, it promotes distrust and hostility and prevents the possibility of peace. We invite everyone to surmount political discord, extinguish the fire of polarisation that is often fuelled by short-lived political ambitions, and seek agreement with the Lithuanian Poles as our fellow citizens who, like everyone else, want to live their lives and build their future, as well as that of their children, in peace and harmony on this soil.

Our ability to live with Poles in concord demonstrates our maturity and Europeanism. Being the larger community we are obliged to offer our hand first and to start the process of reconciliation, which will not be easy and will require much effort. The approaching holiday of the Resurrection urges us to seek concord, for how will we be able to celebrate Easter without having reconciled us with our neighbours?

Vilnius, 10 April 2011

Antanas Gailius; Dr. Irena Vaišvilaitė; Prof. Alvydas Jokubaitis; Dr. Paulius V. Subačius; Prof. Danutė Gailienė; Rev. Julius Sasnauskas OFM; Prof. Rimvydas Petrauskas

Predictably, the open letter has produced a storm of comment on Facebook, though the true nastiness is only visible if you read Polish and Lithuanian.

Meanwhile Poland's largest catholic magazine has produced an ill-informed and spectacularly unpleasant article (subscribers only) on this issue. It accuses Radek Sikorski, seen by many Lithuanians as the bugbear in the relationship, as excessively conciliatory. It would be nice to think the dispute was cooked up in the Kremlin as a clever spetsoperatsiya to sow discord between two countries that should be close allies. But I fear that stupidity is a simpler explanation.

Readers' comments

The Economist welcomes your views. Please stay on topic and be respectful of other readers. Review our comments policy.

from Gdansk

Thank you, EL, for posting the letter from Lithuanian intellectuals. Over here in Poland we certainly don't get the full picture, and I don't think Poland's "largest catholic magazine" is the chief culprit. It's a shame that none of the mainstream media had bothered to make a story out of this. Perhaps because there's nothing to add. "Nic dodać, nic ująć" as they say over here. Pity, too, you also had to add your usual...

PauliusU

I don't want to be primitive, neither to go deep to the topic. But looking from my own subjective point of view, it is another attempt by Polish to provoke political conflict. The only reason I can see for two countries "to be close allies" is geographical propinquity. Over the history Polish showed their opinion to Lithuania: as Lithuania has always had smaller population, territory and influence, it has always been an "inferior" neighbor to Poland. Lithuanians are not respected by Poles and there is no reason why Lithuanian Polish minority should be awarded with so many rights. All recent decisions made by Lithuanian Parliament were right, though minor. Their importance was clearly overexaggerated. It might show new direction of Polish politics. Anyway, I see absolutely no reason to try to find a compromise (what we always try to do.) Lithuanians are just to coward to stand for themselves, especially when now it is not only a simple economic-political question, but also a principal issue of our identity.

And I am not trying to be radical at all.

Cheesus Crust

@Jan Pomorski
>>give Polish people right to be Polish like we gave Lithuanians here right to be Lithuanians.
That's exactly what new education law does.

tenanglik

@mikeinwarsaw: (pano Michale, cześć)
In a Europe where a majority of people are members of some kind of minority (ethnic, religious, national etc.) this controversy about nationalism and minorities has a very old-fashioned ring to it.
Poland and Lithuania can be rightly proud of their success in preserving language and culture through two centuries of foreign domination. But their present extremely homogenous populations, certainly compared with the rest of the continent, are more due to the horrors of WW2 and the appalling forced migrations that followed, than to their own civic virtues.
Voluntary (and forced) migration has been going on for ages. Four hundred years ago my own Scots ancestors were transported to Ireland and forcibly anglicised: Mickiewicz/Mickevicius might not have been impressed but this got them out of the way well before the Highland Clearances - fortunately for me. From them I inherited an unusual family name (first four letters MCCR) which French and German, as well as Polish, officials will sometimes reject as an obvious spelling error. It hadn’t occurred to me before that they might be breaching my human rights.
And the hordes of (very welcome) Polish and Lithuanian migrants who have flooded West in recent years will have experienced plenty of linguistic obstacles including wilful mis-spelling. I recall a rather good Welsh footballer named Krzywicki which the TV commentators always pronounced like ‘krizwikky’. Having few options, he was very good-natured about this. And the leading lights of Polish politics (examples include Rostowski, Sikorski, Bielecki, Gronkiewicz-Waltz) don’t seem to resent their experience of a London that neither knew nor cared how to spell or pronounce their names properly, either.
It’s no surprise that there’s a muddle about how best to write Polish names on a Lithuanian typewriter: but it’s truly astonishing to learn that grown-up politicians can score points with it.

Jan Pomorski

@Cheesus Crust
I don't need to read all Your nonsenses, like "Poles have mastered politically correct facade". You can say that about every nation.
I live in Szczecin, it was German, now is Polish - I don't want and can't change that.
You live in Vilnius, it was Polish, now is German - You want but You can't change that.
There is no need to fear that we, together with the Poles living in Vilnius, will go there and somehow try to get it back. It's just not possible, even if some extremists here think it is (I don't think and don't want that). And this seems to be the real reason You persecute and prohibit being Polish in Lithuania.
So spare us this emotional rubbish and give Polish people right to be Polish like we gave Lithuanians here right to be Lithuanians.

Forlana

Hi discussion club! :)

Poles, just as any large nation throughout Europe are very diverse folk. And subsequently there're many ways Polishness is understood. Using mental broad strokes in the way outsiders try to understand and then depict the way they see Poland is deceptive. Impressions are just what they are – impressions. They too often will lead you astray, like in the case of ascribing to PiS the objections to LT's treatment of her minorities.
Poland's characteristic feature is Church taking part in political life. I dislike it, want to change it, but just as a large part of society I understand the reasons. Too little time to explain now. But automatic ascribing confraternity with Church to just the right part of the political scene leads you astray and makes your understanding of Poland fuzzy, to call it mildly.

There're politician from both largest parties - PO and PiS which seek and receive support from the Church.

Yes we are very proud generally, that's one of the panpolish traits, sometimes our weakness, sometimes strength. But to alleged aggression (verbal) I have absolutely no complexes considering what happens (verbally and physically) in the countries West of Elbe.

Regards and have a nice weekend

Cheesus Crust

@mikeinwarsaw
>>Unfortunately similar views and beliefs are held by large parts of the populations of many other central eastern european States, including Lithuania.

Yes, including Lithuania. The more homogeneous society is, the less tolerance it has. Poles in Poland make 97% of population. Lithuanians in Lithuania - 80%. This figure only is enough to discard any of Poland's accusations about minorites in Lithuania and other countries.

>>I find the Poles theoretically (officially) tolerant but in fact at least half of the population is consciously or subconsciously grossly intolerant.

Confirmed. As I said in other thread, Poles have mastered politically correct facade. Well, many Lithuanians don't bother even about at least facade.

Jan Pomorski

This all historical-religious-industrial talking has no sense and it's not to resolve.
It's about ordinary people lifes and rights and the facts are:
While the Lithuanians in Poland have all their rights respected, Poles in Lithuania don't. That's the only fact I can see here and that's the fact we need to deal with - in the Polish way - hard ! The same thing with Germans, they have minority represantation in Polish parliement, we don't have in German parliement - deal hard with it!

mikeinwarsaw

As a member of what is a (european) ethnic minority currently living in Poland, I find the Poles theoretically (officially) tolerant but in fact at least half of the population is consciously or subconsciously grossly intolerant, full of rabidly aggressive pride and arrogance not only towards other nationalities, ethnic groups and religions but even towards any other Polish citizen who thinks differently or has different values from themselves. This behaviourial and beliefs system is exemplified by the populist nationalists of the Right and their Roman Catholic Church confraternity. They seem to be mainly located in the eastern half of the country which is also the part which is most backward in all terms of measurement.

Unfortunately similar views and beliefs are held by large parts of the populations of many other central eastern european States, including Lithuania. Probably the sole exception is the Czech Republic. Is this because the Czech Republic is by far the most industrialised, urbanised and non-religious and has a relatively high standard of living?

Cheesus Crust

@Josh_01
>>My impression is that Poland demands of Lithuania what it doesn' t give to its own minorities, though, but I' ll follow this debate a bit more and am ready to think it over;-).

The first impression is the right one, usually.

A complication is that the majority of Polish speaking minority is not Polish ethnically at all. (If you don't believe me, read this: "country's Polish-speakers (a loose category, not quite the same as ethnic Poles)" "http://www.europeanvoice.com/article/imported/schools-of-unreasonable-thought-on-educational-reform/70696.aspx")

Some of them identify themselves as ethnic Poles. But many of them DO NOT. I have a friend myself who has a perfect Polish surname in my view, but claims he is not Polish. But not Lithuanian as well. He consideres himself "a citizen of Lithuania". No ethnicity since he don't know who ethnically he is. But definitelly not Lithuanian and not Pole. And that's a failure of Lithuanian state minority policy. Lithuania made good living for all minorities who know who they are, but missed Tuteyshy since you will not find such a ethnicity on the existing lists.

Poland should step back from this problem and leave it for Lithuania to resolve. Lithuanian indiference made the problem worse as some politicians in the region, in the Lithuania and now in Poland are making political points on this situation. The Vilnius rural region, ruled by Polish Election Movement is now the least democratic part of Lithuania, where freedom of speach is almost non existent. One Lithuanian MEP called this region "little Belorus".

apanos

No one outside of the two countries knows about this, or cares. Europeans and their old world, navel gazing, and self important view of history and the world around them tends to hold back their progress on important issues of peace and prosperity.

Number 16

PrinceAlbert & Cegorach:

Some Polish government departments may have software designed to deal with common non-Polish letters and accents, but most typewriters, keyboards and software in any country cannot easily deal with anything other than the national alphabet of that country.

On top of that, most people simply do not have the linguistic skill or training to interpret foreign alphabets and accents.

And where should the line be drawn? If Lithuania accepts the official use of the Polish alphabet, should it also accept the use of Greek, Russian, Georgian, Devengari, Arabic and Chinese?

In private life, people should be free to do as they please, but, in the name of national unity and simple efficiency, a government has to be able to draw a line.

People should realise what country they actually live in and make some attempt to harmonise with local conventions.

cegorach

@princealbert

Cyryllic is also accepted, though obviously as a secondary option in addition to transcryption.
Still proudly displayed in the documents if the owner wants it.

cegorach

I must admit I've read about the letter (in Polish in "Gazeta Wyborcza") with true delight.

It is very important that elites speak against nationalist lunatics who will never cease because their 'cause' demands it and the 'cause' is never met because it cannot be so their efforts last forever. At least they feel good about themselves - so do people who support them, read their exalted rants and vote for them.

It is nice to hear that Lithuanian prime minister seemed to support what was said in the open letter. We will see how it goes in deeds after the words were spoken.

-----------------------------------
About Mr. Sikorski. I wouldn't link the comment to the affair - Mr. Sikorski and the Civic Platform are seen as mortal enemies of these nationalistic fringes for a long time and the supposed 'concessions' are just another mace to club them with.
The situation with Lithuania wouldn't even be mentioned if it couldn't be attempted to be used against Mr. Sikorski and the government of Mr. Tusk - that is how political moves are defined in our lovely populist-nationalist right.

And about discussions about history in the comment section. All what was, is and will be said was repeated thousands of times so whatever. It is impossible to change minds of some people unless they allow it, all the harder because changing mind after a long discussion seems like a capitulation.
If facts are contradicting your vision - damn the facts!

mikeinwarsaw

Unfortunately the ultra catholic nationalist politicians in both Poland and Lithuania are largely to blame for the remarkably un-christian verbosity and actions towards ethnic minorities in both countries. Those politicians are a throwback to the period between the two World Wars when ultra nationalism in its authoritarian form (led by Germany) resulted the catastrophy of 1939-45 and subsequent events. They seemed to have learn nothing whatsoever from the lessons of recent history and the cynicism of draping themselves in christian symbols makes it even worse.

A plague on all of them!

princealbert

Just one more comment on my side :)

As far as I know foreign letters are accepted in official Polish documents. The software used for the delivery of Polish IDs contains a list of 31 of such characters, unknown to Polish language. The most typical are the German Umlauts, which appear in names of many 'ordinary' people but also public figures (e.g. Danuta Hübner, Polish MEP).

Cheesus Crust

@Forlana
>>the Poles in Lithuania, thousand years old nation
Stop posting BS and we will leave history aside. "Poles" in Lithuania is 150 years old nation.

About Eastern approaches

Eastern approaches deals with the economic, political, security and cultural aspects of the eastern half of the European continent. It incorporates the long-running "Europe.view" weekly column. The blog is named after the wartime memoirs of the British soldier Sir Fitzroy Maclean.

Advertisement

Trending topics

Read comments on the site's most popular topics

Advertisement

Products & events