Democracy in America

American politics

Israeli ads

A message for American Jews

Dec 3rd 2011, 7:03 by M.S.

THREE months ago I was on the Golan Heights in the general store of an Israeli "moshav" (farming collective), buying bottled water from a friendly man with an immense curly beard and yarmulke, when my daughter pointed at a xeroxed flyer on the bulletin board and asked "Why is that baby there?" The flyer depicted an upside-down foetus in the womb, and I moved closer to get a better look, assuming that this would be some type of Orthodox religious anti-abortion screed. My Hebrew isn't that great and I wasn't sure I'd be able to figure it out, but once I got closer it became clear that I was looking at an entirely different category of religious propaganda. The picture depicted the foetus superimposed on a map of the occupied West Bank, with the head at the bottom representing the Hebron-Bethlehem area south of Jerusalem, and the curled-up body representing the larger northern Nablus-Jenin-Ramallah-Jericho section. The idea was that God had seen fit to leave the borders of the tract which religious nationalists call by the Biblical names "Judea and Samaria" in the shape of a foetus, as a signal to his chosen people that they should nourish and ultimately deliver the territories as a living part of the Jewish state.

I'd thought I was going to have a hard time explaining an anti-abortion poster to my daughter. That would have been a picnic compared to this thing. And what was most depressing was that this wasn't really such an unrecognisable aberration in style. The vulgar, superstitious literalism was all too familiar, not just from Israeli religious-nationalist thinking but from similar stuff you might have seen among messianic Slavophiles in the Russian empire in the 1890s and on down the reactionary lineage. The idea that living in Israel these days might mean prolonged exposure to this sort of violent drivel made me seriously reflect on how much time I'd want my kids spending there.

So, this week I saw via Jeffrey Goldberg that the government of Bibi Netanyahu had seen fit to put out a couple of commercials aimed at dissuading young Israelis from romantic liaisons with American Jews, lest they or any potential offspring be seduced away by the free-thinking, pluralistic and mostly non-Jewish melting pot that is America. One depicted Israeli grandparents skypeing with their grandchildren in America and lighting a Hanukkah menorah; there's some interchangeable reference on the American side to whether the season is Hanukkah or Christmas, which pains the grandparents. This ad seemed to me to be a weird take on American Jewish culture. If there's one Jewish holiday which every American Jewish kid recognises, it's Hanukkah, which is in any case a religiously unimportant holiday that derives its recent prominence mainly from Jews' need in Christian societies to have a holiday to compete commercially with Christmas. The ad's producers should have tried something with a holiday that actually is important in Israel but largely ignored by American Jews, like Purim. Another ad depicted a New York couple, an Israeli woman identified as "Dafna" and her apparently American Jewish hipster boyfriend; he's oblivious that she is in mourning because it's Yom Hazicaron, Israel's day of remembrance for fallen soldiers and victims of terrorism. The voice-over at the end says "They'll always stay Israelis. Their spouses won't always understand what it means. Help them come back to Israel."

Let me just note here that the young man in this ad looks to me suspiciously like an Israeli hipster, ponytail, accent/intonation and all. More important, as Mr Goldberg wrote, "I don't think I have ever seen a demonstration of Israeli contempt for American Jews as obvious as these ads." There has always been an undercurrent of disdain for diaspora Jews running through part of the Zionist project, and one of the difficulties has been to contain it. It's typical of the bumptious cloddishness of the current Israeli government that it found itself trumpeting that self-defeating message, inflaming the tensions rather than allaying them, and turning off some of its few remaining allies among the secular majority of young American Jews.

After Mr Goldberg denounced the ad campaign, Mr Netanyahu ordered it pulled. Mr Goldberg writes that as far as he's concerned, the minor crisis in Israeli-diaspora relations has been averted. I suppose we ought to leave it at that. But then I read Shmuel Rosner's description of how Sofa Landver, the Israeli minister for absorption who was responsible for the ads, "just doesn't get" why any American Jew would be offended by them.

If I were trying to get across to Mrs Landver why these ads straight out of Israel's anguished id were so infuriating, I might respond with an ad of my own, out of the corresponding part of American Jewry's id. It would depict an intelligent-looking 18-ish American Jewish girl skypeing from Israel with her parents in an American suburban home. "Ariel, we're so glad you decided to take this year to connect with your roots," says Dad. "Me too," says Ariel. Mom: "Hon, the course catalogue arrived from Stanford. When are you flying back for freshman orientation?" "Mom, I'm not sure I'm coming back just yet," says Ariel. "I've met someone." A young religious guy with a beard and skullcap enters frame and waves awkwardly. We pull out to show Ariel and her boyfriend through the window of a trailer on a hilltop in the West Bank. Voice-over: "Israel is part of their identity. It doesn't have to be their whole identity."

Who would ever produce such an ad? I have no idea. The Israeli state has a critical interest in retaining population, so it dedicates resources to promoting a narrow vision of national-religious identity. There's no corresponding powerful organisation with a critical interest in promoting a tolerant, liberal version of Zionism, which is why people like me feel increasingly alienated and increasingly defeated in our efforts to retain some measure of long-term identification with Israel.

Readers' comments

The Economist welcomes your views. Please stay on topic and be respectful of other readers. Review our comments policy.

Biffster

There will only be peace in the world when people finally realize there is no god. Religious zealots of all persuasions are just a throwback to our historical religious leaders' need to hold power over their people. "Do as we say our god says and you will be rewarded... go against our interpretation of a god and you will burn for eternity". This worked on the uneducated masses, but it is time for mankind to grow up and use our brains.

K S Lall

As a progressive Muslim, I used to support the two-state solution advanced by progressives on both sides: the State of Israel on all territory with the Green Line, the State of Palestine on all without, and Al-Quds/Yerushalayim shared as a common capital. However, when I now see that the Israelis are not willing to budge an inch, and many conservatives on their side calling us Muslims as "sub-human" (God forbid), I have now changed my viewpoint and channel all my energies on the Islamic Republic of Palestine all the way from Haifa to the Negev, Inshallah (God willing).

K S Lall in reply to tzatz

No, I pray to my God to guide me; the God of Abraham, Moses, Jesus, and Muhammad. You people, on the other hand, pray to the shekel, dollar, and franc...that is the only God you know. BTW congratulations on the Tel Aviv stock exchange crashing recently!!

tzatz in reply to K S Lall

When your people worshiped at the Kabba … as the Idol worshippers they were … as they killed and stole from each other … as they wed child brides to satisfy their lust …

MY PEOPLE WERE WRITING THE HOLY TORAH … BROUGHT BELIEF OF THE ONE GOD OF THE UNIVERSE TO MANKIND … ENDED CHILD SACRIFICE … BROUGHT 'REAL' PROPHETS TO MANKIND WHOSE VERSES WERE AND ARE READ BY ALL OF MANKIND UNTIL TODAY …

BTW … the State of Israel is a vibrant economic engine … whose Stock Exchange is always climbing and falling … it's a MARKET … don't hold a 'wake' for the Tel Aviv market just yet … you're better off investing there than practically anywhere else …

BTW … how's the stock market in Cairo doing? or the stock market in Damascus? or the stock market in …………(Arab/Muslim country)? Let me know what you produce besides children … I'm interested. lol

K S Lall in reply to tzatz

Ad hominem attacks aside, a Muslim cannot be a Muslim unless he or she recognises the Torah, Psalms, and Gospel as Godly books. The rest of your post is just a rant: you are Islamophobic whereas the Glorious Qur'an 5:5 says a Muslim male may lawfully wed a Jewish female. If you post such one-sided rants again, I shall not waste the pearls of wisdom of my faith on such an infra dig as you.

tzatz in reply to K S Lall

Don't waste your breathe … the Koran is BS … just like the Torah or the Gospels … they're created by man …

Your Muhammad … copied and pasted together his goblidigook … from the prior books of 'wisdom' … I'm proud of my people's book … the Torah

You can be proud of yours too … that's OK

DON'T SPEAK TO ME ABOUT WHAT'S WRITTEN IN IT. I DON'T CARE WHOM YOU CAN MARRY … YOU CAN MARRY MOTHER THERESA FOR ALL I CARE. I AM AN ANTI-ISLAMIST … that's clear. I live in a free country and my beliefs are my own … I WILL NOT DEFER TO YOURS.

tzatz

Oh so you're a Putin fan … the little Bonaparte of Russia … a new dictator … for Mother Russia?

Did you get lost on this site or do you have a point to make?

HTromp

You give prominence to some wacko's comments about a few equally wacko Israeli's.
What about some revelations in your magazine about Abas's glorification of suicide bombers and his TV station programmes teaching children to kill Jews !

Nachman

Thankfully, Israel's vibrant democracy nurtures freedom of speech. Just like in the United States, expect to find all sorts of talk/media in Israel, some that jives with you and some that does not. Of course, if you don't think that a free-speech environment is a good place for children (or for you), try visiting some of Israel's closest neighbors.

BULDOZER

Well, I saw this line of ads!!! Sorry to disappoint you but what is writen in this article just isn't true!!! Ads are calling aducated Israelis who left to America and Europe to return back home!!! I don't understand this, in last few weeks Israel isn't under huge spotlights of the world press, so you're trying to dig something out by force!!! Please, do us all a favor if you allready live on the top of the Golan hights, first learn hebrew and second try harder to write about bird migration over the Golan's sky!!!!

FfNdggfdeW

As an Israeli expat in the United States and no fan of Bibi Nethanyahu, I took a close look at the ads after reading Jeff Goldberg's article, prepared to be disturbed and upset. Much to my surprise, I found no reference in the ads to the spouses' ethnic origin, Jewish or non-Jewish. These ads are directed at secular Israeli Jews living in America, and reference uniquely Israeli Jewish experiences: the pain of the Day of Remembrance; the comfort of the Hebrew Language; and yes -- the celebration of Chanukah, so different in Israel than its celebration in the United States, where blue and silver were invented to compete and compensate for red and green. In the end, the way in which these ads were interpreted points to insensitivity that goes both ways. Clearly, the creators of the ad campaign did not foresee how it would play out in America. But Jeffrey Goldberg, who brings out some fine points in his article, seems to miss the general point of the ads. The Israeli Jewish experience in America, like any immigrant experience, is one of uprootedness; those of us who have chosen this path have done so for many different reasons, but are also paying a price. Yes, you can be a Jew in America; but you can't be an Israeli Jew in American and pass on that unique identity and experience to your children.
In the United States, you can send your children to Stanford University where they won't have to deal with Jewish religious fanatics in the West Bank or, for that matter, with Arab hostility and hatred, so prevalent in the Middle East. But they also will always experience their Judaism as a minority, outsiders looking in on the great Christmas extravaganza. The American Jewish experience is vibrant and rich despite (and sometimes because) of that minority experience; and the Israeli Jewish experience is vibrant and rich despite (and sometimes because) of 100 years of existential struggle. Let's celebrate all that we have to offer each other, as there is much to learn on both sides.

Vaudevillain

Well, after reading every single comment I am now convinced of something that I already suspected:

The Israelis and Palestinians are both wrong, anyone that supports one over the other is wrong, and everyone who thinks they have a monopoly on truth is an idiot.

There must be some part of human nature which causes us to turn every issue into a dialectic wherein one side or the other must be absolutely correct, worthy of praise and support, while the other must be absolutely wrong, worthy of derision and destruction. It is, apparently, impossible for most people to accept that every party to a dispute may suffer from acute cerebral-rectal colocation and that in such a situation, the only rational solution is to tell everyone to shut the hell up.

To that end, I propose a new option to resolving the Israel-Palestine conflict: sort it out for yourselves by 2020, or everyone else turns the entire region and everyone living there into a sheet of highly irradiated glass. Nothing quite like the looming threat of thermonuclear annihilation to resolve childish disputes over who gets to "win" the prisoners' paradox.

Disclaimer: I do not actually advocate this option, I am simply sick to death of the ridiculous rhetoric the two loudest sides have spouted in their 60-year marathon of insulting everyone's intelligence.

Adam Morgan

[Am posting this because, in the comments I've read and in the analysis of the ad, this hasn't been mentioned.]

First, let's begin with a generalized format of a successful ad campaign:

We're X. We want you to buy (or, in this case, relocate) to Y. Here's why you should do so.

Now, if it's successful in, say, a test group, it's run. If it's not, it's modified until it meets a definition of is a successful ad.

So, let's assume that this Israeli commercial went through the same process. That is, it was modified it was until it was successful.

That is, it works (or, worked). This may be the reason that it was aired/made/ran.

sscBDcXXXm

tzatz: I defend my questioning of the conflation of anti-Israeli sentiment with antisemitism; Israel's critics are able to differentiate between Jewry and Israel.

Criticizing Israel does not equate to anti-semitism.

B Flastic

It may be that the ad was "promoting a narrow vision of national-religious identity". But I've spent enough time in Israel to know that it isn't the government that's doing it, just some pieces here and there.

The ad points out that American Jews don't understand a particular memorial holiday in Israel. Not so astonishing. But the Economist editorial just underscores that point, rather than refute it.

In Israel, for example, Hanukkah may be accurately described as a festival of jelly donuts, as much as a festival of lights. The jelly donuts outnumber the menorahs by a large number. Even in Jerusalem. Worry more about sugar than any "Narrow vision".

sscBDcXXXm

Will Zionists - be they Israeli, American or British - ever stop conflating anti-Israel sentiment with antisemitism?

I'm an average secular English guy who is shamed by my nation's involvement in Israel from Christian Zionists in 1919 to the covert provision of heavy water to kick start Dimona.

'Israel's raison d'etre is that it is THE place for the Jewish people' ignores the dispossession by violence of 700K arabs in 1948 and the continued political and economic repression of millions now.

Israel routinely speaks of 'facts on the ground': it is not so keen to refer to the facts on the ground pre-1948.

tzatz in reply to sscBDcXXXm

You're entitled to your opinion.

Facts are different than you have made clear … is your understanding including the dispossession of 700K Arabs.

Research the facts … you'll find your views wrong. You're entitled to keep your views and espouse them but be prepared to defend them if confronted. I'm not going to bother with this issue again here.

However, I will say … anti-Semitism = anti-Zionism … in the modern world. While the former is by most people bad/loathsome … the latter is praiseworthy! To deny the Jewish People their home … is a vile tactic that's been endorsed and promoted by the Arab/Muslims since their inability to destroy Israel in armed conflict is obvious. Calling into question the legality of the Jewish State is noxious anti-Semitism. If it walks like a duck …

You can disagree with certain policies but the right of the Jewish State to its place in the family of nations … is recognized by International organizations and was approved by the UNITED NATIONS in 1947 and prior to that by the LEAGUE OF NATIONS in 1922.

AHuxley in reply to sscBDcXXXm

sscBDcXXXm -

It is true. 700K Arabs fled, were forced out (often violently) or were encouraged by neighboring Arab countries to evacuate land they had lived on in what is currently Israel and the Palestinian Territories. Most of the countries that encouraged them to move put them in Refugee camps and abused them as second-class citizens and political tools.

In the years before and after the same (defensive) war, 700K Jews fled, were forced out (often violently) or were encouraged by the Israeli state and Western powers to evacuate land they had lived on in Arab states. The countries that encouraged them to move assimilated them, though also to a certain extent as second-class citizens (it was more difficult for quite some time for Jews from Arab countries to gain employment from the mainly Ashkenazi Jews on equal footing).

Confirmation bias, my friend; it will provide you facts, but only facts that support your views. Reality is far more complicated.

Cutters in reply to tzatz

Israel was not recognised in 1922, that Palestine should in part be a home land for Jews as Palestinian citizens was. To say otherwise is to speak cheap, non-factual, propaganda. It is propaganda that is often used by those that support the terrorist action of the Lehi and Stern Gang.

Living in Canada, you wouldn't want to support those that carried out terrorist actions... would you?

Lets not forget that the current Israeli government has supported those terrorists, aggrandising heinous actions with medals.

Do you not agree that giving terrorists medals is a heinous act?

Lets not forget that both Kadima and Likud were started by the two named terrorist groups, and that many in both parties believe in an Israel that stretches between the two rivers.

Would you not be hostile to a neighbour that looks to take your land by force?
Is a country that was created by the force of terrorist actions, that aggrandises the murderers and torturers one that anyone should trust?

tzatz in reply to Cutters

"in 1922" … I don't talk to louts like yourself Cutters me brother … NOT

IN 1922 … at the San Remo Conference … the League of Nations … granted the British a Mandate over Palestine … in the Mandate … was embodied the Balfour Declaration … stating the PURPOSE … THE MISSION STATEMENT … of the Mandate was … 'to establish a Jewish Homeland in Palestine' …

That's what the British attempted to do … from 1922 until 1947 … when they asked the UNITED NATIONS … to relieve them of this task … in November 1947 … the UNITED NATIONS … after considerable consultation with ALL PARTIES … Jews … Arabs … Zionists … Christians … in the area … voted to PARTITION Palestine into 2 States: an Arab and a Jewish State …

Between November 1947 … that is, after the Vote for Partition … the indigenous Arabs began a civil war against the Jews … with the British acting as referees … BUT when the British left … in May 1948 … the SURROUNDING ARAB STATES ATTACKED THE NEWLY DECLARED JEWISH STATE FROM ALL SIDES …

That's the history … have you got that straight?

Stop the BS over medals for this or that … who cares at this point. The British have given medals to their soldiers over the years as well for deeds seemed admirable by the State … that the 'other side' seems like MURDER … get over it.

Don't like the Jews/Zionists/Israelis … I get it … 'can you spare some cutter me brother' …  I love that line from one of my favourite films

Cutters in reply to tzatz

The key phrase and one you seem insistent in hurrying over, is that the Jewish homeland (something that if anyone chooses to is more like an Indian reservation) would be in Palestine as Palestinians... not a word about recreating Israel.

And while you love to go on about Arabs declaring war when the Jews in Palestine declared an independent state, you totally ignore the fact that Jewish terrorist groups were raiding and murdering on their lands. The Lehi and Irgan attacks against Lebanon are well documented, as are their massacres of refuges that were fleeing there. And they are 'hero's' worth celebrating in Israel. Nor did the Lehi or Irgan ever except the terms of the UN resolution, they wanted more land and had to be subdued by the larger terrorist groups that were forming the IDF. It was the actions like those of Deir Yassin massacre that lead to Arab intervention:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deir_Yassin_massacre

You fail to mention that Great Britian tried to stem the numbers of Jews heading to Palestine, as many of them turned to the extremist terrorists.

I've have my history straight all right... your rantings have nothing to do with history, and sound more like the ravings of terrorist groups like Kach, or the extremist Jewish Defense League.

JDL:"A right-wing terrorist group" stated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_Defense_League

Kach:A party barred from standing in the 1992 election in Israel, and banned outright in 1994. Today considered terrorist organisations by Israel, Canada, the European Union and the United States.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kach_and_Kahane_Chai

Both share the same symbol, and stand for the same things.

You choose to jump up and down about Arabs, and what they may have done to Jews (funny how the biggest exodus from Iran was not until the 60's and 70's) and dislike it when the extremists from Israel are exposed as those in government, who give the 'brave' murders and hunters of unarmed refugees medals. "In 1980, Israel instituted the Lehi ribbon, red, black, grey, pale blue and white, which is awarded to former members of the Lehi underground who wished to carry it, "for military service towards the establishment of the State of Israel""http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israeli_military_decorations#Service_ribbons

Giving out medals to supporters of the Nazi regime, like Avraham Stern: On 11 January 1941, Vice Admiral Ralf von der Marwitz, the German Naval attaché in Turkey, filed a report (the "Ankara document") conveying an offer by Lehi to "actively take part in the war on Germany's side" in return for German support for "the establishment of the historic Jewish state on a national and totalitarian basis, bound by a treaty with the German Reich."http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lehi_%28group%29

And you say I don't like Jews, you venerate those that sided with a regime with a goal to wipe them out in Europe.

Cutters in reply to Dante-X

Tzatz has no answer other than more extremist right wing propaganda, which wont stand up to the facts.

Extremists tend to be cowardly once exposed for what they are, and faced with having to make excuses for their bigoted views.

Not the first time I have caught Tzatz out like this, and had him fail to explain why the facts are so different to the hate he spreads in his comments.

Dante-X in reply to tzatz

What about Zhirinovsky? I do not consider him seriously at all. You failed to notice that I am mocking the anti-Putin gang with Zhirinovsky or Communists – who else is on their mind?

guest-iiammso

"There's no corresponding powerful organisation with a critical interest in promoting a tolerant, liberal version of Zionism..."

I completely understand where you're coming from when you say this, but the simple fact is that tolerant, liberal ideologies are not very compelling. This ties in with the increasing rates of intermarriage and assimilation among Jews in the United States; Jewish identity in America has become little more than presents on Hanukkah and self-deprecating jokes about "my whiny Jewish grandmother." Why would anyone feel inspired by that culture? It is the self-confident and assertive groups like Chabad that will survive through the ages, because they actually take their identity seriously.

The right-wing Zionist groups are getting more aggressive because they're scared. They're scared about the continued safety and security of Israel, which is always in doubt. They're scared about the growing Arab demographic in their communities. And they're scared that Jewish identity itself is being diluted by modern sociological trends that encourage dismissal and minimization of one's religion. Now they're trying to do something about it. A politically correct ad campaign for a liberal, tolerant Zionism with a message of, "Hey, come to Israel. It's nice here. Your ancestors are from here. You can bring all of your Christian and Muslim friends, too" is just not going to change anything.

FfNdggfdeW

As an Israeli expat in the United States and no fan of Bibi Nethanyahu, I took a close look at the ads after reading Jeff Goldberg's article, prepared to be disturbed and upset. Much to my surprise, I found no reference in the ads to the spouses' ethnic origin, Jewish or non-Jewish. These ads are directed at secular Israeli Jews living in America, and reference uniquely Israeli Jewish experiences: the pain of the Day of Remembrance; the comfort of the Hebrew Language; and yes -- the celebration of Chanukah, so different in Israel than its celebration in the United States, where blue and silver were invented to compete and compensate for red and green. In the end, the way in which these ads were interpreted points to insensitivity that goes both ways. Clearly, the creators of the ad campaign did not foresee how it would play out in America. But Jeffrey Goldberg, who brings out some fine points in his article, seems to miss the general point of the ads. The Israeli Jewish experience in America, like any immigrant experience, is one of uprootedness; those of us who have chosen this path have done so for many different reasons, but are also paying a price. Yes, you can be a Jew in America; but you can't be an Israeli Jew in American and pass on that unique identity and experience to your children.
In the United States, you can send your children to Stanford University where they won't have to deal with Jewish religious fanatics in the West Bank or, for that matter, with Arab hostility and hatred, so prevalent in the Middle East. But they also will always experience their Judaism as a minority, outsiders looking in on the great Christmas extravaganza. The American Jewish experience is vibrant and rich despite (and sometimes because) of that minority experience; and the Israeli Jewish experience is vibrant and rich despite (and sometimes because) of 100 years of existential struggle. Let's celebrate all that we have to offer each other, as there is much to learn on both sides.

FfNdggfdeW

As an Israeli expat in the United States and no fan of Bibi Nethanyahu, I took a close look at the ads after reading Jeff Goldberg's article, prepared to be disturbed and upset. Much to my surprise, I found no reference in the ads to the spouses' ethnic origin, Jewish or non-Jewish. These ads are directed at secular Israeli Jews living in America, and reference uniquely Israeli Jewish experiences: the pain of the Day of Remembrance; the comfort of the Hebrew Language; and yes -- the celebration of Chanukah, so different in Israel than its celebration in the United States, where blue and silver were invented to compete and compensate for red and green. In the end, the way in which these ads were interpreted points to insensitivity that goes both ways. Clearly, the creators of the ad campaign did not foresee how it would play out in America. But Jeffrey Goldberg, who brings out some fine points in his article, seems to miss the general point of the ads. The Israeli Jewish experience in America, like any immigrant experience, is one of uprootedness; those of us who have chosen this path have done so for many different reasons, but are also paying a price. Yes, you can be a Jew in America; but you can't be an Israeli Jew in American and pass on that unique identity and experience to your children.
In the United States, you can send your children to Stanford University where they won't have to deal with Jewish religious fanatics in the West Bank or, for that matter, with Arab hostility and hatred, so prevalent in the Middle East. But they also will always experience their Judaism as a minority, outsiders looking in on the great Christmas extravaganza. The American Jewish experience is vibrant and rich despite (and sometimes because) of that minority experience; and the Israeli Jewish experience is vibrant and rich despite (and sometimes because) of 100 years of existential struggle. Let's celebrate all that we have to offer each other, as there is much to learn on both sides.

Fifth Horseman

I wouldn't live in the rump Bantustan 'states' being offered the Palestinians and you wouldn't either, tzatz. Emancipation and self-determination are fundamental human rights, not terms to be negotiated in some never-ending negotiations to nowhere.

Do unto others as you would have them do unto you. Love your neighbor as yourself. Anything less is a moral and intellectual fraud.

tzatz in reply to Fifth Horseman

Not with that crowd Fifth Horseman …

Jews lived in Arab/Muslim countries for over a 1000 YEARS … they no longer live in them … Yemen, Egypt, Libya et al are JUDENREIN … to name a few …

The Arab/Muslims don't treat 'the other' … those not of the same tribe … religion … clan … 

anything not exactly the same as themselves EXACTLY … as 'lower order humans' … unworthy of equal treatment … THEREFORE … that's HOW I'LL TREAT THEM! They are unworthy of my love … my respect

The Arab/Muslims have been offered a state … contiguous … viable … a 'rump' state … but it'll be there own … to live on and prosper … that's on them if they don't want it. They won't be offered anything better … THEY WILL NEVER BE OFFERED ANYTHING BETTER …

The Israelis are not about to 'take chances' for peace with those that continue to advocate their willingness to 'wipe them off the map' … not recognize their essence as a 'JEWISH STATE' … continue to willfully continue 'resistance' …

The State of Israel follows the principal 'don't do unto others what you don't want done to you' … THAT'S THE 'TORAH' principal advocated by Hillel in the 1st Century ACE … your quote is from the Gospel … doesn't apply!

The Torah principal of 'Love your neighbour as yourself' is something I studied one summer … while on a course given to teachers (I was a teacher for awhile) … it's an interesting principal … hard to achieve … but as a Canadian I'm prepared to do so … BUT NOT WITH ARAB/MUSLIMS WHO ARE NOT MY NEIGHBOURS … those in the WB & GAZA are not my neighbours … THEY ARE MY ENEMIES … WHEN PEACE HAS BEEN ACHIEVED … IT WILL TAKE YEARS BUT THEY COULD BECOME GOOD NEIGHBOURS BUT THAT'S A LONG WAY OFF … till then THERE'S A GOOD SECURE FENCE IN PLACE …

Fifth Horseman

I'm relating fascism to fascism. Judaism, when lived righteously, is a light unto the world. Unfortunately, when religion and politics are combined, whether it be The Third Holy Roman Empire or Eretz Israel, the most likely outcome is a fire-breathing, self-righteous bastardization of religion which doesn't deserve a place in civilized society.

Now com'ere, tzatz, and let me give you a big hug to show you it's nothing personal.

tzatz in reply to Fifth Horseman

Thanks Fifth …

I'm Jewish but not following my religion … however … I am a believer in the JEWISH PEOPLE … being Jewish doesn't mean ONLY RELIGION … thare is a PEOPLEHOOD component.

The Jewish People are under attack in the Jewish State by Arab/Muslim fascists … they intend to replace the Jewish State with another Arab/Muslim State … this is not on offer …

If the Arab/Muslims would lay down their arms … there would be peace … IF THE JEWS LAID DOWN THEIR ARMS … THERE WOULD BE A GENOCIDE …

That's what I believe … the Jews are reasonable … they need a reasonable partner … that partner has not yet arrived …

tzatz in reply to Kalabagh

What do you know about it?

You're an Arab/Muslim … are you a religion … people … simultaneously?

The 3 Basics of Judaism are:

God - Monotheism

Torah - The Law as written in the 5 Books of Moses or the Old Testament

Israel - The Jewish People

These are what constitutes what Jews are … even if you don't practice the religion … you're still Jewish because you're one of the people … Jews are not European or Ethiopian or Indian but they could/can/are of those races! Since Judaism is a universal religion.

So what's your point?

The Nazis attempted to destroy the Jewish People … who cares what they thought … they were/are NUTBARS! Why use their terms of reference? Jews know who Jews are as I've just explained.

What's your point? Be careful!

About Democracy in America

In this blog, our correspondents share their thoughts and opinions on America's kinetic brand of politics and the policy it produces. The blog is named after the study of American politics and society written by Alexis de Tocqueville, a French political scientist, in the 1830s

Advertisement

Trending topics

Read comments on the site's most popular topics

Advertisement

Products & events