Sep 9th 2010, 14:39 by Buttonwood
THE sovereign debt crisis has not gone away. Greece is still paying double-digit yields on its bonds. This column had a go at ranking the most vulnerable countries earlier this year, based on a variety of measures.
Barclays Capital has produced a more sophisticated version, which also has the benefit of including a wider variety of countries. All told, it uses 16 different criteria divided into five broad categories; solvency, fiscal needs, external dependence, financial sector strength and institutional strength (this last cateory based on World Bank governance indicators).
The result would have been a shock to anyone 15 years ago but will not be such a surprise now. The safest 10 countries include five from Asia, two from Latin America, one from Africa and only two from Europe. The ranking, in order, is; Hong Kong, Singapore, Korea, Chile, Taiwan, Germany, South Africa, Czech Republic, Malaysia and Uruguay.
Greece is not quite ranked last; Lebanon takes that dubious honour. After those two, the weakest countries in order are: Pakistan, Vietnam, Ukraine, Egypt, Ireland, Lithuania, Italy and Romania. Six Europeans in the bottom 10!
Of course, there are plenty of developing countries that are not included but it is still striking to see, for example, Italy ranked lower than El Salvador. All told there are 48 countries in the rankings with the US and UK just above halfway at 20th and 22nd respectively. Only 20 years after the fall of communism and the US is ranked lower than Russia!
This is not just a matter of national pride. Barclays reckons that some 70% of the variability in credit default swap spreads is down to the criteria used; the more you fall down the rankings, the more you are likely to pay.
Incidentally, I thought the comments went slightly off at a tangent in discussing whether Henry Ford really used the strategy described by Arun Motianey in yesterday's note. I agree a company couldn't really prosper by paying its workers to buy its goods; that is why I used the bootstrap analogy. The reference was designed to encourage thoughts about whether the finance sector's expansion (or economic stimulus plans) amount to the same flawed strategy.
In this blog, our Buttonwood columnist grapples with the ever-changing financial markets and the motley crew who earn their living by attempting to master them. The blog is named after the 1792 agreement that regulated the informal brokerage conducted under a buttonwood tree on Wall Street.
Advertisement
Over the past five days
Over the past seven days
Advertisement
Readers' comments
The Economist welcomes your views. Please stay on topic and be respectful of other readers. Review our comments policy.
Sort:
Could someone provide the name of the report Barclays Capital came out with?
Investmentbanker crap. No sane person would prefer to lend to Hong Kong over say Norway.... Not that i expect any of those to default anytime soon, but if one has to pick, please thats just another pathetic atempt to bully nations into market fundamentalism with a ridiculous model that favours rightwinger countries. The absolute hightlight on the good list is Soutafrica. Theres a slum bonus maybe in that model? More slums, higher rateing for proofen willingness to throw the population under the bus or what?
Barclays didn't seem to take political stability (internal & external) into account.
Beware investment bankers bearing models...
I thought the crisis of the last few years had proved that investment bankers typically find it difficult to assess risk appropriately. This exercise would seem to bear it out for sovereign debt. You can run as many numbers as you like, but does anyone really believe the US is less safe than Russia? Or that UK government debt is riskier than South Africa's? Or indeed, that Italy deserves its place close to the bottom of the table?
Whatever current problems the advanced countries face, they have proved 'safe' for some considerable time (yes, even Italy) given stable institutional frameworks. It seems to me it is too soon to tell if many of the newly-strong emerging economies have similarly stable institutional frameworks or whether they are simply benefiting from a commodity super-cycle.
We'll have to see if England's goal keeper (Central bank) muffs one, and England springs into the top 10.
Regards
Yeah, comments will do that. Criticism accepted.
I think the shock to the 1995-era cro-magnon might be a measure fro how much the fraught geopolitics of the 80s had cost. Semi-liberals like Hu and Lula strike me as rewards for denationalizing public goofiness.