Babbage

Science and technology

The exploration of Mars

Borscht, Mars and the Great Galactic Ghoul

Nov 14th 2011, 16:32 by T.C.

DESPITE half a century of looking, there remains no direct evidence for life elsewhere in the universe. But a few astronomers and planetary scientists suspect that there may be something lurking out there in the Solar System. Of the dozens of spacecraft sent to Mars, only around half have managed to arrive. In 1964 a light-hearted exchange between a journalist and John Casani, a NASA scientist, spawned the idea of a "Great Galactic Ghoul", a malevolent creature that prowls the space-lanes between Earth and Mars, dining on unfortunate spacecraft.

Its latest victim appears to be Phobos-Grunt, a Russian vessel designed to return a soil sample from Phobos, the bigger of the Red Planet's two moons. The probe launched as planned on November 8th. A few hours later, in theory at least, the spacecraft's engines should have fired, placing it into a higher orbit in preparation for its subsequent departure for Mars. But that never happened. Instead, the craft remains in its original orbit, obstinately refusing to communicate with engineers on the ground.

Engineers from Roscosmos, the Russian space agency, were initially bullish about their ability to revive their somnolent spacecraft, but now, almost a week after the launch, hopes are fading. In theory, engineers have until the end of the month to re-establish contact before the different orbits of Earth and Mars make reaching the latter impossible. The craft's low orbit means that waiting for another launch window is not possible: Roscosmos scientists have been quoted as saying that their probe will fall back to Earth early in the new year.

The Ghoul seems to have acquired something of a taste for Russian fare. Phobos-Grunt is Russia's first mission to Mars since Mars 96, which crashed back to Earth after a rocket failure. The mission before that, Phobos 2, arrived at Mars in 1989, but a faulty computer knocked it out before it could complete its mission. Phobos 1, its predecessor, vanished en route when another computer error caused it to lose its lock on the Sun, and with it the solar power which fed its systems.

Readers' comments

The Economist welcomes your views. Please stay on topic and be respectful of other readers. Review our comments policy.

Pepernoot

I take it the Russians didn't pay up the several million Martian dollars their previous Mars-craft was being held hostage for.

Fish face

Speculation is that Phobos Grunt debris has crashed to earth near Charleville in Queensland, Australia. An aircraft report of falling debris and impact site are yet to be confirmed.

jason92

This is interesting to know that there are still attempts by other countries to go to distant planets. I was under the impression that we hadn't sent and ships or probes to another planet for decades. Still the galactic ghoul is a humorous twist on things. It is disappointing that the russian's probes don't seem willing to cooperate. Maybe they have a fear of going to mars. :)

zx6r

The math and minds that are behind these missions are incredible. So many comments above are bashing their failures but I say well done. Space is really the only place that has not been disturbed by humans (or at least the least amount). I do not think their is a ghoul because many more missions would have been stopped. But there is also the fact that we as the human public do not always hear (through news) the truth. There are many things that governments could still be hiding from us or from other governments. Why would the U.S. tell any other country about life they found, governments are selfish and have only their best in mind. Plus who is going to find out, there are not many people or robots in space to radio back and tell. Either way space is going to intrigue millions for millions of years, if we last that long.

dbritt13

This article definitely sparks the curiosity and mystery aspect of any person. But realistically speaking, the Galactic Ghoul probably does not exist. The missions that have tried to launch probes to Mars and its surroundings have had to travel thousands of miles, and any numbers of things could go wrong along the way. It would be awesome if there was other life out there, but my bets are that the equipment was not made ready for the brutal trip to Mars's regions. Hopefully the Russian probe does not fall back into a populated area of Earth.

hokie5

It's wild that we can even put these things in space. It's too bad they have to malfunction and can't perform their tasks, thus being a complete waste of money. There are limitless possibilities in space, and it will be very interesting to see what we obtain from our efforts in the future.

passaroa@vt.edu

Just a reminder of the complexity of space exploration. While many people may simply brush it off as being simple these days since it was done successfully 40 years ago, it is still incredibly complicated, especially getting to Mars effectively. On a side note about the beginning of the article, noting that there is no evidence for life anywhere else in the universe, it is important to remember that "life" could take on many forms elsewhere in the universe and may not be similar at all to life as we know it on Earth.

Ediggs

Sounds to me like this "ghoul" is more of a lack or Russian engineering than space monster. I realize that landing a small probe on a distant planet may not be the easiest thing in the world, but every launch needs to be successful today. Every failed mission puts scientists, engineers, and funding programs confused and broke. If we ever want to put a person on mars, these small unmanned missions need to be consistent and dependable. Why would an astronaut want to climb into a space ship heading to mars after watching a robot's engines fail to fire and come crashing down to earth.

typingmonkey

All this should put into perspective the magnitude of the accomplishment that was Apollo 11. 3 men to the moon and back, 42 years ago, with the most rudimentary of computers.

And for you armchair critics out there, bear in mind that America, Japan, and Europe have also failed undertaking similar missions. Rather than mock Russia's mishaps, we should regret the current troubles of a once great competitor in one of humanity's ultimate collective challenges. Their triumphs were ours too. So too their losses.

Aucklander

We're all Aliens, made up of space dust. Not to mention that there are already creatures on earth just as different from each other as other aliens will be when we meet them. The universe has randomly thrown up different forms of life within Earth's own biosphere, its certain that this pattern would emerge elsewhere. Why I myself am from Betelgeuse, and I don't find you offensive at all.

tsmith91

I have always thought that if each star that we can see is similar to our sun, some having orbiting planets, there has to be something else out there. I'm not sure how close to home these other species would be but I do believe it is possible that there is life on other planets.

jouris

But the idea of a "Great Galactic Ghoul" is so much more comfortable than accepting that the problem is either human error or inadequate quality control!

Concerned Turkey

The reason for the malfunction is probably just human error. Some of the connections were engineered poorly or perhaps unwanted waves may have interfered with the scientists signaling. I'm sure it is also difficult to send signaling to spacecraft as far away as mars. The distance between the planets is the ghoul that has been swallowing up our spacecraft.

Zambino

A reminder of the complexity and difficulty of managing missions in extreme environments, with highly engineered bespoke machines over millions of miles. The GGG - also known as human fallibility.

No Mist

irresponsible agencies which endanger the lives of others by launching unsafe probes should be barred from space faring.

willstewart

To make a serious point about a lighthearted piece; the Great Galactic Ghoul is clearly misnamed. If he(?she) is confined to the orbit of Mars they are hardly more 'galactic' than we are (or a typical ant's nest if you prefer).

The point is a glitch of scale - even the 'Great Solar System Ghoul' would be off an order of magnitude or so, and the GGG may be alliterative but is off so many orders of magnitude as top look silly.

About Babbage

In this blog, our correspondents report on the intersections between science, technology, culture and policy. The blog takes its name from Charles Babbage, a Victorian mathematician and engineer who designed a mechanical computer.

Advertisement

Babbage audio

Trending topics

Read comments on the site's most popular topics

Advertisement

Products & events